Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

What should I Ask: A Knowledge-driven Approach for Follow-up Questions Generation in Conversational Surveys

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2205.10977 v2 pith:UVCZZNPK submitted 2022-05-23 cs.CL cs.HC

classification cs.CLcs.HC
keywords follow-upquestionsconversationalgenerationknowledge-drivensurveyscoherentdataset
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Generating follow-up questions on the fly could significantly improve conversational survey quality and user experiences by enabling a more dynamic and personalized survey structure. In this paper, we proposed a novel task for knowledge-driven follow-up question generation in conversational surveys. We constructed a new human-annotated dataset of human-written follow-up questions with dialogue history and labeled knowledge in the context of conversational surveys. Along with the dataset, we designed and validated a set of reference-free Gricean-inspired evaluation metrics to systematically evaluate the quality of generated follow-up questions. We then propose a two-staged knowledge-driven model for the task, which generates informative and coherent follow-up questions by using knowledge to steer the generation process. The experiments demonstrate that compared to GPT-based baseline models, our two-staged model generates more informative, coherent, and clear follow-up questions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Exploring LLMs for Automated Generation and Adaptation of Questionnaires

    cs.HC 2025-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    LLM-generated survey questions were rated as clear and specific, while LLM-based pretesting improved some adapted questions but often made original questions wordier and less clear.

Pith tools