Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Deep interpretable ensembles

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2205.12729 v1 pith:Q4SBJ52W submitted 2022-05-25 stat.ML cs.LG

classification stat.MLcs.LG
keywords ensemblesdeeptransformationmodelsinterpretablepredictionsensembledemonstrate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Ensembles improve prediction performance and allow uncertainty quantification by aggregating predictions from multiple models. In deep ensembling, the individual models are usually black box neural networks, or recently, partially interpretable semi-structured deep transformation models. However, interpretability of the ensemble members is generally lost upon aggregation. This is a crucial drawback of deep ensembles in high-stake decision fields, in which interpretable models are desired. We propose a novel transformation ensemble which aggregates probabilistic predictions with the guarantee to preserve interpretability and yield uniformly better predictions than the ensemble members on average. Transformation ensembles are tailored towards interpretable deep transformation models but are applicable to a wider range of probabilistic neural networks. In experiments on several publicly available data sets, we demonstrate that transformation ensembles perform on par with classical deep ensembles in terms of prediction performance, discrimination, and calibration. In addition, we demonstrate how transformation ensembles quantify both aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty, and produce minimax optimal predictions under certain conditions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. What makes an Ensemble (Un) Interpretable?

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A complexity-theoretic analysis showing that the number, size, and type of base models determine whether ensemble explanations are tractable, with linear-model ensembles intractable even for two models.

  2. Bridging Neural Networks and Dynamic Time Warping for Adaptive Time Series Classification

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A recurrent network built from the DTW recurrence, using compressed prototypes, often beats DTW-kNN in low-resource settings and stays close to deep learning baselines on UCR benchmarks.

Pith tools