REVIEW 1 cited by
Surround-view Fisheye Camera Perception for Automated Driving: Overview, Survey and Challenges
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Surround-view fisheye cameras are commonly used for near-field sensing in automated driving. Four fisheye cameras on four sides of the vehicle are sufficient to cover 360{\deg} around the vehicle capturing the entire near-field region. Some primary use cases are automated parking, traffic jam assist, and urban driving. There are limited datasets and very little work on near-field perception tasks as the focus in automotive perception is on far-field perception. In contrast to far-field, surround-view perception poses additional challenges due to high precision object detection requirements of 10cm and partial visibility of objects. Due to the large radial distortion of fisheye cameras, standard algorithms cannot be extended easily to the surround-view use case. Thus, we are motivated to provide a self-contained reference for automotive fisheye camera perception for researchers and practitioners. Firstly, we provide a unified and taxonomic treatment of commonly used fisheye camera models. Secondly, we discuss various perception tasks and existing literature. Finally, we discuss the challenges and future direction.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Image Segmentation: Inducing graph-based learning
Adding a GNN bottleneck to U-Net improves segmentation IoU on fisheye, natural, and dermoscopic images, with the largest gains on fisheye imagery.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.