Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Anchor Sampling for Federated Learning with Partial Client Participation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2206.05891 v2 pith:BCGC2LHG submitted 2022-06-13 cs.LG cs.DCstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.DCstat.ML
keywords clientparticipationpartialanchorfedamdfederatedlearningclients
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Compared with full client participation, partial client participation is a more practical scenario in federated learning, but it may amplify some challenges in federated learning, such as data heterogeneity. The lack of inactive clients' updates in partial client participation makes it more likely for the model aggregation to deviate from the aggregation based on full client participation. Training with large batches on individual clients is proposed to address data heterogeneity in general, but their effectiveness under partial client participation is not clear. Motivated by these challenges, we propose to develop a novel federated learning framework, referred to as FedAMD, for partial client participation. The core idea is anchor sampling, which separates partial participants into anchor and miner groups. Each client in the anchor group aims at the local bullseye with the gradient computation using a large batch. Guided by the bullseyes, clients in the miner group steer multiple near-optimal local updates using small batches and update the global model. By integrating the results of the two groups, FedAMD is able to accelerate the training process and improve the model performance. Measured by $\epsilon$-approximation and compared to the state-of-the-art methods, FedAMD achieves the convergence by up to $O(1/\epsilon)$ fewer communication rounds under non-convex objectives. Empirical studies on real-world datasets validate the effectiveness of FedAMD and demonstrate the superiority of the proposed algorithm: Not only does it considerably save computation and communication costs, but also the test accuracy significantly improves.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Overcoming Challenges of Partial Client Participation in Federated Learning : A Comprehensive Review

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A survey categorizing and comparing twelve federated learning methods for partial client participation, weakened by several citation mismatches and unsourced benchmark numbers.

Pith tools