Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Pareto Invariant Risk Minimization: Towards Mitigating the Optimization Dilemma in Out-of-Distribution Generalization

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2206.07766 v2 pith:WDOD44SP submitted 2022-06-15 cs.LG stat.ML

classification cs.LGstat.ML
keywords objectivesoptimizationpaircompromisesminimizationparetopenaltyrisk
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recently, there has been a growing surge of interest in enabling machine learning systems to generalize well to Out-of-Distribution (OOD) data. Most efforts are devoted to advancing optimization objectives that regularize models to capture the underlying invariance; however, there often are compromises in the optimization process of these OOD objectives: i) Many OOD objectives have to be relaxed as penalty terms of Empirical Risk Minimization (ERM) for the ease of optimization, while the relaxed forms can weaken the robustness of the original objective; ii) The penalty terms also require careful tuning of the penalty weights due to the intrinsic conflicts between ERM and OOD objectives. Consequently, these compromises could easily lead to suboptimal performance of either the ERM or OOD objective. To address these issues, we introduce a multi-objective optimization (MOO) perspective to understand the OOD optimization process, and propose a new optimization scheme called PAreto Invariant Risk Minimization (PAIR). PAIR improves the robustness of OOD objectives by cooperatively optimizing with other OOD objectives, thereby bridging the gaps caused by the relaxations. Then PAIR approaches a Pareto optimal solution that trades off the ERM and OOD objectives properly. Extensive experiments on challenging benchmarks, WILDS, show that PAIR alleviates the compromises and yields top OOD performances.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Robust Invariant Representation Learning by Distribution Extrapolation

    cs.LG 2025-05 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    A new IRMv1 penalty based on extrapolated per-sample gradient magnitudes is proposed, with reported gains over IRM baselines on synthetic and vision benchmarks.

  2. Data Heterogeneity Modeling for Trustworthy Machine Learning

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A survey that frames heterogeneity-aware machine learning as a paradigm spanning data collection, training, evaluation, and deployment, drawing mostly on the authors' prior results.

Pith tools