REVIEW 2 cited by
MET: Masked Encoding for Tabular Data
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
We consider the task of self-supervised representation learning (SSL) for tabular data: tabular-SSL. Typical contrastive learning based SSL methods require instance-wise data augmentations which are difficult to design for unstructured tabular data. Existing tabular-SSL methods design such augmentations in a relatively ad-hoc fashion and can fail to capture the underlying data manifold. Instead of augmentations based approaches for tabular-SSL, we propose a new reconstruction based method, called Masked Encoding for Tabular Data (MET), that does not require augmentations. MET is based on the popular MAE approach for vision-SSL [He et al., 2021] and uses two key ideas: (i) since each coordinate in a tabular dataset has a distinct meaning, we need to use separate representations for all coordinates, and (ii) using an adversarial reconstruction loss in addition to the standard one. Empirical results on five diverse tabular datasets show that MET achieves a new state of the art (SOTA) on all of these datasets and improves up to 9% over current SOTA methods. We shed more light on the working of MET via experiments on carefully designed simple datasets.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
CACTI: Leveraging Copy Masking and Contextual Information to Improve Tabular Data Imputation
CACTI combines median-truncated copy masking with language-model column embeddings to improve tabular imputation accuracy across MCAR, MAR, and MNAR missingness.
-
Representation Learning for Tabular Data: A Comprehensive Survey
A comprehensive survey that categorizes deep tabular representation learning into specialized, transferable, and general models, with a feature/sample/objective taxonomy for specialized methods.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.