Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Cosmogenic background study for a 100Mo-based bolometric demonstration experiment at China JinPing underground Laboratory

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2206.09288 v1 pith:MMDRI7CL submitted 2022-06-18 physics.ins-det hep-exnucl-ex

classification physics.ins-dethep-exnucl-ex
keywords betacosmogenicbackgroundundergroundexperimentcopperdemonstrationmo-based
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

We perform simulation study for a 10-kg $^{100}$Mo-based bolometeric demonstration experiment for neutrinoless double-beta decay ($0\nu\beta\beta$) search at China JinPing underground Laboratory (CJPL). Cosmogenic production of radionuclides in $^{100}$Mo-enriched lithium molybdate crystals and copper components of the detector system are studied using Geant4 toolkit based on the simulated cosmic ray data from the CRY library. Background energy spectra of the cosmogenic radionuclides including $^{56}$Co, $^{82}$Rb and $^{88}$Y which are harmful for the $^{100}$Mo-based $0\nu\beta\beta$ experiment are investigated. We then evaluate the total cosmogenic background level in the $^{100}$Mo $0\nu\beta\beta$ search energy region of interest (ROI) for the demonstration experiment. After one year of cooling down underground, the residual background contribution is found to be 1.8$\times$10$^{-6}$ cts/kg/keV/yr and 3.3$\times$10$^{-4}$ cts/kg/keV/yr from crystals and copper components, respectively. Furthermore, underground cosmogenic activation of copper and lithium molybdate crystal is calculated based on the simulation spectra of neutron and proton in CJPL. The underground cosmogenic background is found to be negligible in the ROI.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools