Pith. Sign in

RECORD

On approximating the rank of graph divisors

Combinatorics · Submitted 20 Jun 2022

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim As a corollary, we show that the rank is difficult to approximate to within a factor of $O(2^{\log^{1-\varepsilon}n})$ for any $\varepsilon > 0$ unless $P=NP$.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2206.09662 (version 2)
Pith IDSP37E4IG, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationHung P. Hoang, Krist\'of B\'erczi, Lilla T\'othm\'er\'esz. "On approximating the rank of graph divisors." arXiv:2206.09662 (2022). https://pith.science/paper/SP37E4IG
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 6,408 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.06 · states limitation 0.39 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.02 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.97 · compares with prior results 0.92 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Baker and Norine initiated the study of graph divisors as a graph-theoretic analogue of the Riemann-Roch theory for Riemann surfaces. One of the key concepts of graph divisor theory is the {\it rank} of a divisor on a graph. The importance of the rank is well illustrated by Baker's {\it Specialization lemma}, stating that the dimension of a linear system can only go up under specialization from curves to graphs, leading to a fruitful interaction between divisors on graphs and curves. Due to its decisive role, determining the rank is a central problem in graph divisor theory. Kiss and T\'othm\'eresz reformulated the problem using chip-firing games, and showed that computing the rank of a divisor on a graph is NP-hard via reduction from the Minimum Feedback Arc Set problem. In this paper, we strengthen their result by establishing a connection between chip-firing games and the Minimum Target Set Selection problem. As a corollary, we show that the rank is difficult to approximate to within a factor of $O(2^{\log^{1-\varepsilon}n})$ for any $\varepsilon > 0$ unless $P=NP$. Furthermore, assuming the Planted Dense Subgraph Conjecture, the rank is difficult to approximate to within a factor of $O(n^{1/4-\varepsilon})$ for any $\varepsilon>0$.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Baker and Norine initiated the study of graph divisors as a graph-theoretic analogue of the Riemann-Roch theory for Riemann surfaces. background 1.00 0.03 0.01 asserted 1.00
s1 One of the key concepts of graph divisor theory is the {\it rank} of a divisor on a graph. background 1.00 0.04 0.01 asserted 1.00
s2 The importance of the rank is well illustrated by Baker's {\it Specialization lemma}, stating that the dimension of a linear system can only go up under specialization from curves to graphs, leading to a fruitful interaction between divisors on graphs and curves. background 1.00 0.03 0.02 asserted 0.99
s3 Due to its decisive role, determining the rank is a central problem in graph divisor theory. background 0.99 0.05 0.02 asserted 1.00
s4 Kiss and T\'othm\'eresz reformulated the problem using chip-firing games, and showed that computing the rank of a divisor on a graph is NP-hard via reduction from the Minimum Feedback Arc Set problem. background 1.00 0.03 0.03 asserted 1.00
s5 In this paper, we strengthen their result by establishing a connection between chip-firing games and the Minimum Target Set Selection problem. contribution 0.99 0.92 0.10 asserted 1.00
s6 As a corollary, we show that the rank is difficult to approximate to within a factor of $O(2^{\log^{1-\varepsilon}n})$ for any $\varepsilon > 0$ unless $P=NP$. result 0.99 0.94 0.53 asserted 1.00
s7 Furthermore, assuming the Planted Dense Subgraph Conjecture, the rank is difficult to approximate to within a factor of $O(n^{1/4-\varepsilon})$ for any $\varepsilon>0$. result 0.99 0.85 0.20 asserted 0.83

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.99.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Baker and Norine initiated the study of graph divisors as a graph-theoretic analogue of the Riemann-Roch theory for Riemann surfaces. One of the key concepts of graph divisor theory is the {\it rank} of a divisor on a graph. The importance of the rank is well illustrated by Baker's {\it Specialization lemma}, stating that the dimension of a linear system can only go up under specialization from curves to graphs, leading to a fruitful interaction between divisors on graphs and curves. Due to its decisive role, determining the rank is a central problem in graph divisor theory. Kiss and T\'othm\'eresz reformulated the problem using chip-firing games, and showed that computing the rank of a divisor on a graph is NP-hard via reduction from the Minimum Feedback Arc Set problem. In this paper, we strengthen their result by establishing a connection between chip-firing games and the Minimum Target Set Selection problem. As a corollary, we show that the rank is difficult to approximate to within a factor of $O(2^{\log^{1-\varepsilon}n})$ for any $\varepsilon > 0$ unless $P=NP$. Furthermore, assuming the Planted Dense Subgraph Conjecture, the rank is difficult to approximate to within a factor of $O(n^{1/4-\varepsilon})$ for any $\varepsilon>0$.

Human review
How the literature uses it

What this paper does with the arXiv papers it cites

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

What it cites · 1 sentence without a confident label

Cites as background 2 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.