Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Comment on "Experimentally adjudicating between different causal accounts of Bell-inequality violations via statistical model selection"

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2206.10619 v4 pith:FYTXZ3OJ submitted 2022-06-21 quant-ph physics.hist-ph

classification quant-phphysics.hist-ph
keywords modelsmodelsuperdeterministicaccountsadditionaladjudicatinganalyseauthors
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In a recent paper (Phys. Rev. A 105, 042220 (2022)), Daley et al claim that some superdeterministic models are disfavoured against standard quantum mechanics, because such models overfit the statistics of a Bell-type experiment which the authors conducted. We add to the discussion by providing additional context about how few superdeterministic models fall into the category they analyse, and by emphasising that overfitting, while better as a measure of finetuning than other measures given in the literature, does not necessarily indicate a model is universally bad.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools