RECORD
On the Optimisation of the GSACA Suffix Array Construction Algorithm
Data Structures and Algorithms · Submitted 24 Jun 2022
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim Our resulting algorithm is not only significantly faster than GSACA but also outperforms DivSufSort and DSH.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
The suffix array is arguably one of the most important data structures in sequence analysis and consequently there is a multitude of suffix sorting algorithms. However, to this date the GSACA algorithm introduced in 2015 is the only known non-recursive linear-time suffix array construction algorithm (SACA). Despite its interesting theoretical properties, there has been little effort in improving the algorithm's subpar real-world performance. There is a super-linear algorithm DSH which relies on the same sorting principle and is faster than DivSufSort, the fastest SACA for over a decade. This paper is concerned with analysing the sorting principle used in GSACA and DSH and exploiting its properties in order to give an optimised linear-time algorithm. Our resulting algorithm is not only significantly faster than GSACA but also outperforms DivSufSort and DSH.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | The suffix array is arguably one of the most important data structures in sequence analysis and consequently there is a multitude of suffix sorting algorithms. | background 1.00 | 0.04 | 0.02 | asserted 0.74 |
| s1 | However, to this date the GSACA algorithm introduced in 2015 is the only known non-recursive linear-time suffix array construction algorithm (SACA). | background 0.96 | 0.08 | 0.03 | asserted 1.00 |
| s2 | Despite its interesting theoretical properties, there has been little effort in improving the algorithm's subpar real-world performance. | gap 0.92 | 0.07 | 0.02 | asserted 1.00 |
| s3 | There is a super-linear algorithm DSH which relies on the same sorting principle and is faster than DivSufSort, the fastest SACA for over a decade. | background 0.99 | 0.09 | 0.03 | asserted 1.00 |
| s4 | This paper is concerned with analysing the sorting principle used in GSACA and DSH and exploiting its properties in order to give an optimised linear-time algorithm. | contribution 0.90 | 0.67 | 0.08 | asserted 0.92 |
| s5 | Our resulting algorithm is not only significantly faster than GSACA but also outperforms DivSufSort and DSH. | result 0.99 | 0.94 | 0.91 | asserted 1.00 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v2
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
The suffix array is arguably one of the most important data structures in sequence analysis and consequently there is a multitude of suffix sorting algorithms. However, to this date the GSACA algorithm introduced in 2015 is the only known non-recursive linear-time suffix array construction algorithm (SACA). Despite its interesting theoretical properties, there has been little effort in improving the algorithm's subpar real-world performance. There is a super-linear algorithm DSH which relies on the same sorting principle and is faster than DivSufSort, the fastest SACA for over a decade. This paper is concerned with analysing the sorting principle used in GSACA and DSH and exploiting its properties in order to give an optimised linear-time algorithm. Our resulting algorithm is not only significantly faster than GSACA but also outperforms DivSufSort and DSH.
Human review
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.