REVIEW 2 cited by
Humans are not Boltzmann Distributions: Challenges and Opportunities for Modelling Human Feedback and Interaction in Reinforcement Learning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Reinforcement learning (RL) commonly assumes access to well-specified reward functions, which many practical applications do not provide. Instead, recently, more work has explored learning what to do from interacting with humans. So far, most of these approaches model humans as being (nosily) rational and, in particular, giving unbiased feedback. We argue that these models are too simplistic and that RL researchers need to develop more realistic human models to design and evaluate their algorithms. In particular, we argue that human models have to be personal, contextual, and dynamic. This paper calls for research from different disciplines to address key questions about how humans provide feedback to AIs and how we can build more robust human-in-the-loop RL systems.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Mapping out the Space of Human Feedback for Reinforcement Learning: A Conceptual Framework
A conceptual framework classifies human feedback to RL agents along nine dimensions and seven quality criteria, unifying human-centered, interface-centered, and model-centered design perspectives.
-
Probabilistic Artificial Intelligence
A course textbook that explains how probabilistic inference underlies modern machine learning and sequential decision-making, with no new research results.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.