Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Simplifying Dataflow Dialogue Design

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2206.14125 v1 pith:VF7AWVMW submitted 2022-06-28 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords dialoguedatasetannotationcommunitycontributionsdataflowdesignsdirection
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

In \citep{andreas2020task-oriented}, a dataflow (DF) based dialogue system was introduced, showing clear advantages compared to many commonly used current systems. This was accompanied by the release of SMCalFlow, a practically relevant, manually annotated dataset, more detailed and much larger than any comparable dialogue dataset. Despite these remarkable contributions, the community has not shown further interest in this direction. What are the reasons for this lack of interest? And how can the community be encouraged to engage in research in this direction? One explanation may be the perception that this approach is too complex - both the the annotation and the system. This paper argues that this perception is wrong: 1) Suggestions for a simplified format for the annotation of the dataset are presented, 2) An implementation of the DF execution engine is released\footnote{https://github.com/telepathylabsai/OpenDF}, which can serve as a sandbox allowing researchers to easily implement, and experiment with, new DF dialogue designs. The hope is that these contributions will help engage more practitioners in exploring new ideas and designs for DF based dialogue systems.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools