Pith. Sign in

RECORD

On unigraphic $3$-polytopes of radius one

Combinatorics · Submitted 5 Jul 2022

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We give an exhaustive list of these sequences for the case where one degree equals $p-1$ and exactly two or three of them equal $3$.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2207.02040 (version 1)
Pith IDQ47TDPUE, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationRiccardo W. Maffucci. "On unigraphic $3$-polytopes of radius one." arXiv:2207.02040 (2022). https://pith.science/paper/Q47TDPUE
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,999 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.37 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.01 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.89 · compares with prior results 0.07 · mentions code or data availability 0.04.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We ask which degree sequences admit a unique realisation as a $3$-polytopal graph (polyhedron) on $p$ vertices. We give an exhaustive list of these sequences for the case where one degree equals $p-1$ and exactly two or three of them equal $3$. We also find all $3$-polytopes of radius one with $p\leq 17$, and those with $q\leq 41$ edges, by developing a fast algorithm and making use of High Performance Computing.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We ask which degree sequences admit a unique realisation as a $3$-polytopal graph (polyhedron) on $p$ vertices. background 0.87 0.30 0.05 unclear 0.87
s1 We give an exhaustive list of these sequences for the case where one degree equals $p-1$ and exactly two or three of them equal $3$. result 0.71 0.96 0.46 asserted 1.00
s2 We also find all $3$-polytopes of radius one with $p\leq 17$, and those with $q\leq 41$ edges, by developing a fast algorithm and making use of High Performance Computing. contribution 0.62 0.97 0.16 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.77 · evidence from simulation or computation 0.90.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We ask which degree sequences admit a unique realisation as a $3$-polytopal graph (polyhedron) on $p$ vertices. We give an exhaustive list of these sequences for the case where one degree equals $p-1$ and exactly two or three of them equal $3$. We also find all $3$-polytopes of radius one with $p\leq 17$, and those with $q\leq 41$ edges, by developing a fast algorithm and making use of High Performance Computing.

Human review
How the literature uses it

2 arXiv papers cite this in 20 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 16 sentences without a confident label

Builds on it 1 paper
Compares with it 1 paper

What it cites

Cites as background 2 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.