Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Improving the Faithfulness of Abstractive Summarization via Entity Coverage Control

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2207.02263 v1 pith:CXRHQFKV submitted 2022-07-05 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords summarizationabstractivecontrolcoverageentitymethodbenchmarkdatasets
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Abstractive summarization systems leveraging pre-training language models have achieved superior results on benchmark datasets. However, such models have been shown to be more prone to hallucinate facts that are unfaithful to the input context. In this paper, we propose a method to remedy entity-level extrinsic hallucinations with Entity Coverage Control (ECC). We first compute entity coverage precision and prepend the corresponding control code for each training example, which implicitly guides the model to recognize faithfulness contents in the training phase. We further extend our method via intermediate fine-tuning on large but noisy data extracted from Wikipedia to unlock zero-shot summarization. We show that the proposed method leads to more faithful and salient abstractive summarization in supervised fine-tuning and zero-shot settings according to our experimental results on three benchmark datasets XSum, Pubmed, and SAMSum of very different domains and styles.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. FormosanBench: Benchmarking Low-Resource Austronesian Languages in the Era of Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new benchmark shows state-of-the-art LLMs perform poorly on three Taiwanese indigenous languages across MT, ASR, and summarization.

Pith tools