Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Application of Validation Obligations to Security Concerns

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2207.03209 v1 pith:WHNQUQMV submitted 2022-07-07 cs.LO

classification cs.LO
keywords obligationsvalidationconcernsmodelrequirementssecuritysystemstechniques
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Our lives become increasingly dependent on safety- and security-critical systems, so formal techniques are advocated for engineering such systems. One of such techniques is validation obligations that enable formalizing requirements early in development to ensure their correctness. Furthermore, validation obligations help hold requirements consistent in an evolving model and create assurances about the model's completeness. Although initially proposed for safety properties, this paper shows how the technique of validation obligations enables us to also reason about security concerns through an example from the medical domain.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. From What to How: A Taxonomy of Formalized Security Properties

    cs.SE 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    The authors propose an SDLC taxonomy that refines first-level security properties into design-level sub-properties, and formalize a subset in Event-B to check consistency.

Pith tools