REVIEW 4 cited by
Model marginalized constraints on neutrino properties from cosmology
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
We present robust, model-marginalized limits on both the total neutrino mass ($\sum m_\nu$) and abundance ($N_{\rm eff}$) to minimize the role of parameterizations, priors and models when extracting neutrino properties from cosmology. The cosmological observations we consider are CMB temperature fluctuation and polarization measurements, Supernovae Ia luminosity distances, BAO observations and determinations of the growth rate parameter from the Data Release 16 of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey IV. The degenerate neutrino mass spectrum (which implies $\sum m_\nu>0$) is weakly (moderately) preferred over the normal and inverted hierarchy possibilities, which imply the priors $\sum m_\nu>0.06$ and $\sum m_\nu>0.1$ eV respectively. Concerning the underlying cosmological model, the $\Lambda$CDM minimal scenario is almost always strongly preferred over the possible extensions explored here. The most constraining $95\%$ CL bound on the total neutrino mass in the $\Lambda$CDM+$\sum m_\nu$ picture is $\sum m_\nu< 0.087$ eV. The parameter $N_{\rm eff}$ is restricted to $3.08\pm 0.17$ ($68\%$ CL) in the $\Lambda$CDM+$N_{\rm eff}$ model. These limits barely change when considering the $\Lambda$CDM+$\sum m_\nu$+$N_{\rm eff}$ scenario. Given the robustness and the strong constraining power of the cosmological measurements employed here, the model-marginalized posteriors obtained considering a large spectra of non-minimal cosmologies are very close to the previous bounds, obtained within the $\Lambda$CDM framework in the degenerate neutrino mass spectrum. Future cosmological measurements may improve the current Bayesian evidence favouring the degenerate neutrino mass spectra, challenging therefore the consistency between cosmological neutrino mass bounds and oscillation neutrino measurements, and potentially suggesting a more complicated cosmological model and/or neutrino sector.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Neutrino masses from large-scale structures: future sensitivity and theory dependence
Forecasted 1-sigma sensitivity to the sum of neutrino masses is 15 meV for Planck+DESI and 7 meV for CMB-S4+MegaMapper, with the one-loop bispectrum providing 10% and 30% of the constraining power.
-
Origin of cosmological neutrino mass bounds: background $\textit{versus}$ perturbations
The CMB bound on the sum of neutrino masses comes mostly from the background energy density of massive neutrinos, not from their free-streaming effects.
-
Cosmological Constraints on Neutrino Masses in Quintessential Inflation
In the α-attractor quintessential-inflation scenario, Planck PR4 + DESI DR2 BAO + Pantheon+ supernova data imply Σmν < 0.067 eV (flat) and <0.116 eV (with curvature).
-
Illustrating the consequences of a misuse of $\sigma_8$ in cosmology
Cosmologists should compare clustering amplitude with the h-independent statistic sigma_12 instead of sigma_8, because sigma_8's smoothing scale shifts with H0 and artificially worsens the growth tension in high-H0 models.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.