Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Social media sharing by political elites: An asymmetric American exceptionalism

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2207.06313 v1 pith:7G5D5TKD submitted 2022-07-13 cs.CY

classification cs.CY
keywords informationmediasharinguntrustworthydivergenceelitespoliticalsocial
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Increased sharing of untrustworthy information on social media platforms is one of the main challenges of our modern information society. Because information disseminated by political elites is known to shape citizen and media discourse, it is particularly important to examine the quality of information shared by politicians. Here we show that from 2016 onward, members of the Republican party in the U.S. Congress have been increasingly sharing links to untrustworthy sources. The proportion of untrustworthy information posted by Republicans versus Democrats is diverging at an accelerating rate, and this divergence has worsened since president Biden was elected. This divergence between parties seems to be unique to the U.S. as it cannot be observed in other western democracies such as Germany and the United Kingdom, where left-right disparities are smaller and have remained largely constant.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. News Source Citing Patterns in AI Search Systems

    cs.IR 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    AI search engines concentrate news citations among a few mostly left-leaning, high-quality outlets, and users do not appear to base preferences on cited source leaning or quality.

Pith tools