Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Four New Fast Radio Bursts Discovered in the Parkes 70-cm Pulsar Survey Archive

High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena · Submitted 25 Jul 2022

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Our results suggest that pulsar survey archives remain important sources of previously undetected FRBs and that searches for FRBs on time scales extending beyond $\sim 100$ ms may reveal the presence of a larger population of wide-pulse FRBs.

how it is stated · hedged possibility 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2207.12332 (version 1)
Pith ID5OVTH633, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationA. Laity, D. Zoeller, F. Crawford, M. Golden, S. Hisano, T. Kikunaga. "Four New Fast Radio Bursts Discovered in the Parkes 70-cm Pulsar Survey Archive." arXiv:2207.12332 (2022). https://pith.science/paper/5OVTH633
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 5,660 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.76 · states limitation 0.21 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.11 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.98 · compares with prior results 0.95 · mentions code or data availability 0.03.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We present four new fast radio bursts discovered in a search of the Parkes 70-cm pulsar survey data archive for dispersed single pulses and bursts. We searched dispersion measures (DMs) ranging between 0 to 5000 pc cm$^{-3}$ with the HEIMDALL and FETCH detection and classification algorithms. All four of the FRBs discovered have significantly larger widths ($> 50$ ms) than almost all of the FRBs detected and cataloged to date. The large pulse widths are not dominated by interstellar scattering or dispersive smearing within channels. One of the FRBs has a DM of 3338 pc cm$^{3}$, the largest measured for any FRB to date. These are also the first FRBs detected by any radio telescope so far, predating the Lorimer Burst by almost a decade. Our results suggest that pulsar survey archives remain important sources of previously undetected FRBs and that searches for FRBs on time scales extending beyond $\sim 100$ ms may reveal the presence of a larger population of wide-pulse FRBs.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We present four new fast radio bursts discovered in a search of the Parkes 70-cm pulsar survey data archive for dispersed single pulses and bursts. contribution 0.98 0.97 0.10 asserted 1.00
s1 We searched dispersion measures (DMs) ranging between 0 to 5000 pc cm$^{-3}$ with the HEIMDALL and FETCH detection and classification algorithms. method 1.00 0.95 0.02 asserted 0.99
s2 All four of the FRBs discovered have significantly larger widths ($> 50$ ms) than almost all of the FRBs detected and cataloged to date. result 1.00 0.89 0.14 asserted 1.00
s3 The large pulse widths are not dominated by interstellar scattering or dispersive smearing within channels. result 0.72 0.84 0.06 asserted 1.00
s4 One of the FRBs has a DM of 3338 pc cm$^{3}$, the largest measured for any FRB to date. result 1.00 0.90 0.07 asserted 1.00
s5 These are also the first FRBs detected by any radio telescope so far, predating the Lorimer Burst by almost a decade. result 0.87 0.39 0.07 asserted 1.00
s6 Our results suggest that pulsar survey archives remain important sources of previously undetected FRBs and that searches for FRBs on time scales extending beyond $\sim 100$ ms may reveal the presence of a larger population of wide-pulse FRBs. interpretation 0.94 0.70 0.86 hedged possibility 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: empirical study 1.00 · evidence from analysis of existing data 0.99.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We present four new fast radio bursts discovered in a search of the Parkes 70-cm pulsar survey data archive for dispersed single pulses and bursts. We searched dispersion measures (DMs) ranging between 0 to 5000 pc cm$^{-3}$ with the HEIMDALL and FETCH detection and classification algorithms. All four of the FRBs discovered have significantly larger widths ($> 50$ ms) than almost all of the FRBs detected and cataloged to date. The large pulse widths are not dominated by interstellar scattering or dispersive smearing within channels. One of the FRBs has a DM of 3338 pc cm$^{3}$, the largest measured for any FRB to date. These are also the first FRBs detected by any radio telescope so far, predating the Lorimer Burst by almost a decade. Our results suggest that pulsar survey archives remain important sources of previously undetected FRBs and that searches for FRBs on time scales extending beyond $\sim 100$ ms may reveal the presence of a larger population of wide-pulse FRBs.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

2 arXiv papers cite this in 2 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it

Uses its data or values 1 paper
Cites it as background 1 paper

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.