Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Uncertainty-Driven Action Quality Assessment

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2207.14513 v3 pith:J6CALDTY submitted 2022-07-29 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords uncertaintyactionassessmentmultipledesigndiversityduringexpert
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Automatic action quality assessment (AQA) has attracted increasing attention due to its wide applications. However, most existing AQA methods employ deterministic models to predict the final score for each action, while overlooking the subjectivity and diversity among expert judges during the scoring process. In this paper, we propose a novel probabilistic model, named Uncertainty-Driven AQA (UD-AQA), to utilize and capture the diversity among multiple judge scores. Specifically, we design a Conditional Variational Auto-Encoder (CVAE)-based module to encode the uncertainty in expert assessment, where multiple judge scores can be produced by sampling latent features from the learned latent space multiple times. To further utilize the uncertainty, we generate the estimation of uncertainty for each prediction, which is employed to re-weight AQA regression loss, effectively reducing the influence of uncertain samples during training. Moreover, we further design an uncertainty-guided training strategy to dynamically adjust the learning order of the samples from low uncertainty to high uncertainty. The experiments show that our proposed method achieves competitive results on three benchmarks including the Olympic events MTL-AQA and FineDiving, and the surgical skill JIGSAWS datasets.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Two-Stage Multi-Modal Fusion with Adaptive Alignment for Action Quality Assessment

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A two-stage alignment framework that first fuses visual modalities (RGB, flow, skeleton) then introduces text, achieving 21% SRCC improvement on a new clinical AQA dataset and gains on two public benchmarks.

  2. A Decade of Action Quality Assessment: Largest Systematic Survey of Trends, Challenges, and Future Directions

    cs.AI 2025-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A systematic review of Action Quality Assessment organizes the past decade of research into 7 trends, 9 dataset domains, and performance comparisons across 195 papers.

Pith tools