REVIEW 2 cited by
Uncertainty-Driven Action Quality Assessment
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Automatic action quality assessment (AQA) has attracted increasing attention due to its wide applications. However, most existing AQA methods employ deterministic models to predict the final score for each action, while overlooking the subjectivity and diversity among expert judges during the scoring process. In this paper, we propose a novel probabilistic model, named Uncertainty-Driven AQA (UD-AQA), to utilize and capture the diversity among multiple judge scores. Specifically, we design a Conditional Variational Auto-Encoder (CVAE)-based module to encode the uncertainty in expert assessment, where multiple judge scores can be produced by sampling latent features from the learned latent space multiple times. To further utilize the uncertainty, we generate the estimation of uncertainty for each prediction, which is employed to re-weight AQA regression loss, effectively reducing the influence of uncertain samples during training. Moreover, we further design an uncertainty-guided training strategy to dynamically adjust the learning order of the samples from low uncertainty to high uncertainty. The experiments show that our proposed method achieves competitive results on three benchmarks including the Olympic events MTL-AQA and FineDiving, and the surgical skill JIGSAWS datasets.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Two-Stage Multi-Modal Fusion with Adaptive Alignment for Action Quality Assessment
A two-stage alignment framework that first fuses visual modalities (RGB, flow, skeleton) then introduces text, achieving 21% SRCC improvement on a new clinical AQA dataset and gains on two public benchmarks.
-
A Decade of Action Quality Assessment: Largest Systematic Survey of Trends, Challenges, and Future Directions
A systematic review of Action Quality Assessment organizes the past decade of research into 7 trends, 9 dataset domains, and performance comparisons across 195 papers.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.