Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Deep Bayesian Active-Learning-to-Rank for Endoscopic Image Data

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2208.03020 v1 pith:2TNNCR4N submitted 2022-08-05 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords relativeseverityannotationbayesianpairsactive-learning-to-rankappropriateautomatically
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Automatic image-based disease severity estimation generally uses discrete (i.e., quantized) severity labels. Annotating discrete labels is often difficult due to the images with ambiguous severity. An easier alternative is to use relative annotation, which compares the severity level between image pairs. By using a learning-to-rank framework with relative annotation, we can train a neural network that estimates rank scores that are relative to severity levels. However, the relative annotation for all possible pairs is prohibitive, and therefore, appropriate sample pair selection is mandatory. This paper proposes a deep Bayesian active-learning-to-rank, which trains a Bayesian convolutional neural network while automatically selecting appropriate pairs for relative annotation. We confirmed the efficiency of the proposed method through experiments on endoscopic images of ulcerative colitis. In addition, we confirmed that our method is useful even with the severe class imbalance because of its ability to select samples from minor classes automatically.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. X-Factor: Quality Is a Dataset-Intrinsic Property

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Across 2,500 class-balanced MNIST subsets and 10 model architectures, test-error Z-scores correlate strongly across models (mean R2=0.82 excluding GNB), supporting dataset quality as an intrinsic property.

Pith tools