Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Property Directed Reachability for Generalized Petri Nets

Logic in Computer Science · Submitted 5 Aug 2022

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We have implemented our methods in a model-checker called SMPT and give empirical evidences that our approach can handle problems that are difficult or impossible to check with current state of the art tools.

how it is stated · asserted 0.91 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2208.03043 (version 1)
Pith IDZQYAG7QB, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationNicolas Amat, Silvano Dal Zilio, Thomas Hujsa. "Property Directed Reachability for Generalized Petri Nets." arXiv:2208.03043 (2022). https://pith.science/paper/ZQYAG7QB
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 2,995 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.06 · states limitation 0.57 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.17 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.06 · compares with prior results 0.75 · mentions code or data availability 0.28.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We propose a semi-decision procedure for checking generalized reachability properties, on generalized Petri nets, that is based on the Property Directed Reachability (PDR) method. We actually define three different versions, that vary depending on the method used for abstracting possible witnesses, and that are able to handle problems of increasing difficulty. We have implemented our methods in a model-checker called SMPT and give empirical evidences that our approach can handle problems that are difficult or impossible to check with current state of the art tools.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We propose a semi-decision procedure for checking generalized reachability properties, on generalized Petri nets, that is based on the Property Directed Reachability (PDR) method. contribution 0.97 0.92 0.29 asserted 1.00
s1 We actually define three different versions, that vary depending on the method used for abstracting possible witnesses, and that are able to handle problems of increasing difficulty. contribution 0.67 0.93 0.09 asserted 1.00
s2 We have implemented our methods in a model-checker called SMPT and give empirical evidences that our approach can handle problems that are difficult or impossible to check with current state of the art tools. result 0.68 0.97 0.50 asserted 0.91

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 1.00 · evidence from observation or experiment 0.55.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We propose a semi-decision procedure for checking generalized reachability properties, on generalized Petri nets, that is based on the Property Directed Reachability (PDR) method. We actually define three different versions, that vary depending on the method used for abstracting possible witnesses, and that are able to handle problems of increasing difficulty. We have implemented our methods in a model-checker called SMPT and give empirical evidences that our approach can handle problems that are difficult or impossible to check with current state of the art tools.

Human review
How the literature uses it

What this paper does with the arXiv papers it cites

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.