Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Smartwatch-based ecological momentary assessments for occupant wellness and privacy in buildings

Human-Computer Interaction · Submitted 12 Aug 2022

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim The experiment identified occupant information such as the tendencies for the research participants to prefer privacy in certain spaces and the difference between infectious disease risk perception in naturally versus mechanically ventilated spaces.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2208.06080 (version 1)
Pith IDVNI7NDJT, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationAndre Matthias M\"uller, Clayton Miller, Federico Tartarini, Jin Kai Leong, Mahmoud Abdelrahman, Mario Frei, Matias Quintana, Renee Christensen. "Smartwatch-based ecological momentary assessments for occupant wellness and privacy in buildings." arXiv:2208.06080 (2022). https://pith.science/paper/VNI7NDJT
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,354 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.05 · states limitation 0.22 · human participants 0.98 · controlled comparison 0.07 · randomized assignment 0.02 · states quantitative result 0.06 · compares with prior results 0.16 · mentions code or data availability 0.13.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

This paper describes the adaptation of an open-source ecological momentary assessment smart-watch platform with three sets of micro-survey wellness-related questions focused on i) infectious disease (COVID-19) risk perception, ii) privacy and distraction in an office context, and iii) triggers of various movement-related behaviors in buildings. This platform was previously used to collect data for thermal comfort, and this work extends its use to other domains. Several research participants took part in a proof-of-concept experiment by wearing a smartwatch to collect their micro-survey question preferences and perception responses for two of the question sets. Participants were also asked to install an indoor localization app on their phone to detect where precisely in the building they completed the survey. The experiment identified occupant information such as the tendencies for the research participants to prefer privacy in certain spaces and the difference between infectious disease risk perception in naturally versus mechanically ventilated spaces.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 This paper describes the adaptation of an open-source ecological momentary assessment smart-watch platform with three sets of micro-survey wellness-related questions focused on i) infectious disease (COVID-19) risk perception, ii) privacy and distraction in an office context, and iii) triggers of various movement-related behaviors in buildings. contribution 0.90 0.86 0.06 asserted 0.98
s1 This platform was previously used to collect data for thermal comfort, and this work extends its use to other domains. background 0.85 0.22 0.03 asserted 1.00
s2 Several research participants took part in a proof-of-concept experiment by wearing a smartwatch to collect their micro-survey question preferences and perception responses for two of the question sets. method 0.96 0.89 0.03 asserted 1.00
s3 Participants were also asked to install an indoor localization app on their phone to detect where precisely in the building they completed the survey. method 1.00 0.83 0.02 asserted 0.98
s4 The experiment identified occupant information such as the tendencies for the research participants to prefer privacy in certain spaces and the difference between infectious disease risk perception in naturally versus mechanically ventilated spaces. result 1.00 0.95 0.53 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: empirical study 0.53 · evidence from observation or experiment 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

This paper describes the adaptation of an open-source ecological momentary assessment smart-watch platform with three sets of micro-survey wellness-related questions focused on i) infectious disease (COVID-19) risk perception, ii) privacy and distraction in an office context, and iii) triggers of various movement-related behaviors in buildings. This platform was previously used to collect data for thermal comfort, and this work extends its use to other domains. Several research participants took part in a proof-of-concept experiment by wearing a smartwatch to collect their micro-survey question preferences and perception responses for two of the question sets. Participants were also asked to install an indoor localization app on their phone to detect where precisely in the building they completed the survey. The experiment identified occupant information such as the tendencies for the research participants to prefer privacy in certain spaces and the difference between infectious disease risk perception in naturally versus mechanically ventilated spaces.

Human review

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.