REVIEW 2 cited by
Differentially Private Hypothesis Testing with the Subsampled and Aggregated Randomized Response Mechanism
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Randomized response is one of the oldest and most well-known methods for analyzing confidential data. However, its utility for differentially private hypothesis testing is limited because it cannot achieve high privacy levels and low type I error rates simultaneously. In this article, we show how to overcome this issue with the subsample and aggregate technique. The result is a general-purpose method that can be used for both frequentist and Bayesian testing. {{We illustrate the performance of our proposal in three scenarios: goodness-of-fit testing for linear regression models, nonparametric testing of a location parameter with the Wilcoxon test, and the nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Differentially private scale testing via rank transformations and percentile modifications
New differentially private rank-based tests for two-sample scale differences achieve controlled type I error and often beat generic private testing frameworks in power.
-
Fiducial Matching: Differentially Private Inference for Categorical Data
FIMA builds differentially private confidence intervals and hypothesis tests for categorical data by matching the released statistic to simulated noisy versions via a fiducial solution.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.