Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

IndicSUPERB: A Speech Processing Universal Performance Benchmark for Indian languages

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2208.11761 v2 pith:G47SISRF submitted 2022-08-24 cs.CL cs.SDeess.AS

classification cs.CLcs.SDeess.AS
keywords modelslanguagespeechlanguagesidentificationlargeself-supervisedtasks
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

A cornerstone in AI research has been the creation and adoption of standardized training and test datasets to earmark the progress of state-of-the-art models. A particularly successful example is the GLUE dataset for training and evaluating Natural Language Understanding (NLU) models for English. The large body of research around self-supervised BERT-based language models revolved around performance improvements on NLU tasks in GLUE. To evaluate language models in other languages, several language-specific GLUE datasets were created. The area of speech language understanding (SLU) has followed a similar trajectory. The success of large self-supervised models such as wav2vec2 enable creation of speech models with relatively easy to access unlabelled data. These models can then be evaluated on SLU tasks, such as the SUPERB benchmark. In this work, we extend this to Indic languages by releasing the IndicSUPERB benchmark. Specifically, we make the following three contributions. (i) We collect Kathbath containing 1,684 hours of labelled speech data across 12 Indian languages from 1,218 contributors located in 203 districts in India. (ii) Using Kathbath, we create benchmarks across 6 speech tasks: Automatic Speech Recognition, Speaker Verification, Speaker Identification (mono/multi), Language Identification, Query By Example, and Keyword Spotting for 12 languages. (iii) On the released benchmarks, we train and evaluate different self-supervised models alongside a commonly used baseline FBANK. We show that language-specific fine-tuned models are more accurate than baseline on most of the tasks, including a large gap of 76\% for the Language Identification task. However, for speaker identification, self-supervised models trained on large datasets demonstrate an advantage. We hope IndicSUPERB contributes to the progress of developing speech language understanding models for Indian languages.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Recognizing Every Voice: Towards Inclusive ASR for Rural Bhojpuri Women

    eess.AS 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Using 25-30 seconds of audio per speaker from 100 rural Bhojpuri women, synthetic speech augmentation cuts ASR word error on the new SRUTI benchmark by 4.7 points.

  2. Technical report: Impact of Duration Prediction on Speaker-specific TTS for Indian Languages

    eess.AS 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    In a five-language zero-shot TTS study, no single duration prediction strategy dominates: speaker-prompted durations help some languages, infilling durations help others, and results vary by metric.

  3. A2TTS: TTS for Low Resource Indian Languages

    cs.SD 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A2TTS adds a reference-audio cross-attention duration predictor to a Grad-TTS and UnitSpeech style diffusion TTS, improving speaker similarity scores in seven Indian languages.

Pith tools