REVIEW 1 cited by
Extracting Mathematical Concepts from Text
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We investigate different systems for extracting mathematical entities from English texts in the mathematical field of category theory as a first step for constructing a mathematical knowledge graph. We consider four different term extractors and compare their results. This small experiment showcases some of the issues with the construction and evaluation of terms extracted from noisy domain text. We also make available two open corpora in research mathematics, in particular in category theory: a small corpus of 755 abstracts from the journal TAC (3188 sentences), and a larger corpus from the nLab community wiki (15,000 sentences).
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Math Natural Language Inference: this should be easy!
A new Math NLI corpus from category theory abstracts plus a ten-model evaluation shows LLM unanimous votes approach human labels (88%) but individual LLMs still make basic math reasoning errors.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.