REVIEW 1 cited by
Scheduling Operator Assistance for Shared Autonomy in Multi-Robot Teams
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
In this paper, we consider the problem of allocating human operator assistance in a system with multiple autonomous robots. Each robot is required to complete independent missions, each defined as a sequence of tasks. While executing a task, a robot can either operate autonomously or be teleoperated by the human operator to complete the task at a faster rate. We show that the problem of creating a teleoperation schedule that minimizes makespan of the system is NP-Hard. We formulate our problem as a Mixed Integer Linear Program, which can be used to optimally solve small to moderate sized problem instances. We also develop an anytime algorithm that makes use of the problem structure to provide a fast and high-quality solution of the operator scheduling problem, even for larger problem instances. Our key insight is to identify blocking tasks in greedily-created schedules and iteratively remove those blocks to improve the quality of the solution. Through numerical simulations, we demonstrate the benefits of the proposed algorithm as an efficient and scalable approach that outperforms other greedy methods.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Joint Decision-Making in Robot Teleoperation: When are Two Heads Better Than One?
In a robot teleoperation task, choosing the more confident operator's pick in a dyad beats the higher-performing individual, and the benefit depends on skill similarity and confidence calibration.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.