Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Modified Einstein versus Modified Euler for Dark Matter

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2209.03614 v2 pith:DBCNBA75 submitted 2022-09-08 astro-ph.CO gr-qc

classification astro-ph.COgr-qc
keywords darkgravitationalmatterforceparticlesfifthgravitymeasurement
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Modifications of General Relativity generically contain additional degrees of freedom that can mediate forces between matter particles. One of the common manifestations of a fifth force in alternative gravity theories is a difference between the gravitational potentials felt by relativistic and non-relativistic particles, also known as "the gravitational slip". In contrast, a fifth force between dark matter particles, due to dark sector interaction, does not cause a gravitational slip, making the latter a possible smoking gun of modified gravity. In this article, we point out that a force acting on dark matter particles, as in models of coupled quintessence, would also manifest itself as a measurement of an effective gravitational slip by cosmological surveys of large-scale structure. This is linked to the fact that redshift-space distortions due to peculiar motion of galaxies do not provide a measurement of the true gravitational potential if dark matter is affected by a fifth force. Hence, it is extremely challenging to distinguish a dark sector interaction from a modification of gravity with cosmological data alone. Future observations of gravitational redshift from galaxy surveys can help to break the degeneracy between these possibilities, by providing a direct measurement of the distortion of time. We discuss this and other possible ways to resolve this important question.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Gravitational redshift from large-scale structure: nonlinearities, antisymmetries, and the dipole

    astro-ph.CO 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A wide-angle streaming model including gravitational redshift, lightcone and kinematic effects explains the dipole turnover at ~20 h^-1 Mpc as an advection-like shift driven by the density-weighted pairwise potential ...

  2. A novel test of gravity: Does spacetime geometry track matter density?

    astro-ph.CO 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The new Ngrow statistic, built from galaxy clustering and lensing, finds no deviation from GR and forecasts stage-IV surveys to bound geometry-density growth mismatches at 2-4%.

Pith tools