REVIEW 2 cited by
Computational Sarcasm Analysis on Social Media: A Systematic Review
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Sarcasm can be defined as saying or writing the opposite of what one truly wants to express, usually to insult, irritate, or amuse someone. Because of the obscure nature of sarcasm in textual data, detecting it is difficult and of great interest to the sentiment analysis research community. Though the research in sarcasm detection spans more than a decade, some significant advancements have been made recently, including employing unsupervised pre-trained transformers in multimodal environments and integrating context to identify sarcasm. In this study, we aim to provide a brief overview of recent advancements and trends in computational sarcasm research for the English language. We describe relevant datasets, methodologies, trends, issues, challenges, and tasks relating to sarcasm that are beyond detection. Our study provides well-summarized tables of sarcasm datasets, sarcastic features and their extraction methods, and performance analysis of various approaches which can help researchers in related domains understand current state-of-the-art practices in sarcasm detection.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
LLM-Based vs. Lexicon-Based Sentiment Signals for Tail-Risk Detection in Meme Stocks
LLM-derived multidimensional sentiment shows stronger but still asset-dependent statistical links to meme-stock returns than VADER, with no stable forecasting advantage.
-
CAF-I: A Collaborative Multi-Agent Framework for Enhanced Irony Detection with Large Language Models
CAF-I, a multi-agent LLM framework with context, semantic, and rhetorical agents plus a refinement evaluator, reports state-of-the-art zero-shot irony detection, averaging 76.31 Macro-F1 across four benchmarks.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.