Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

TwistSLAM++: Fusing multiple modalities for accurate dynamic semantic SLAM

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2209.07888 v2 pith:3F4HV563 submitted 2022-09-16 cs.CV cs.RO

classification cs.CVcs.RO
keywords objectslaminformationobjectsposescanssemanticaccuracy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Most classical SLAM systems rely on the static scene assumption, which limits their applicability in real world scenarios. Recent SLAM frameworks have been proposed to simultaneously track the camera and moving objects. However they are often unable to estimate the canonical pose of the objects and exhibit a low object tracking accuracy. To solve this problem we propose TwistSLAM++, a semantic, dynamic, SLAM system that fuses stereo images and LiDAR information. Using semantic information, we track potentially moving objects and associate them to 3D object detections in LiDAR scans to obtain their pose and size. Then, we perform registration on consecutive object scans to refine object pose estimation. Finally, object scans are used to estimate the shape of the object and constrain map points to lie on the estimated surface within the BA. We show on classical benchmarks that this fusion approach based on multimodal information improves the accuracy of object tracking.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Is Semantic SLAM Ready for Embedded Systems ? A Comparative Survey

    cs.RO 2025-05 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A comparative survey and embedded benchmark concluding that semantic geometric SLAM is more practical for real-time deployment than NeRF- or Gaussian-splatting-based semantic SLAM.

Pith tools