REVIEW 1 cited by
Integrative Feature and Cost Aggregation with Transformers for Dense Correspondence
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We present a novel architecture for dense correspondence. The current state-of-the-art are Transformer-based approaches that focus on either feature descriptors or cost volume aggregation. However, they generally aggregate one or the other but not both, though joint aggregation would boost each other by providing information that one has but other lacks, i.e., structural or semantic information of an image, or pixel-wise matching similarity. In this work, we propose a novel Transformer-based network that interleaves both forms of aggregations in a way that exploits their complementary information. Specifically, we design a self-attention layer that leverages the descriptor to disambiguate the noisy cost volume and that also utilizes the cost volume to aggregate features in a manner that promotes accurate matching. A subsequent cross-attention layer performs further aggregation conditioned on the descriptors of both images and aided by the aggregated outputs of earlier layers. We further boost the performance with hierarchical processing, in which coarser level aggregations guide those at finer levels. We evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed method on dense matching tasks and achieve state-of-the-art performance on all the major benchmarks. Extensive ablation studies are also provided to validate our design choices.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Semantic Correspondence: Unified Benchmarking and a Strong Baseline
Fine-tuning the last layers of DINOv2, optionally with a lightweight cost aggregator, yields state-of-the-art semantic correspondence accuracy, and a new survey and benchmark consolidate the field's results.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.