Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Determine the Core Structure and Nuclear Equation of State of Rotating Core-Collapse Supernovae with Gravitational Waves by Convolutional Neural Networks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2209.10089 v1 pith:7ZT3ANS7 submitted 2022-09-21 astro-ph.HE

Determine the Core Structure and Nuclear Equation of State of Rotating Core-Collapse Supernovae with Gravitational Waves by Convolutional Neural Networks

classification astro-ph.HE
keywords coreratesrotationalwaveformsaccuracycore-collapseequationgravitational
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Detecting gravitational waves from a nearby core-collapse supernova would place meaningful constraints on the supernova engine and nuclear equation of state. Here we use Convolutional Neural Network models to identify the core rotational rates, rotation length scales, and the nuclear equation of state (EoS), using the 1824 waveforms from Richers et al. (2017) for a 12 solar mass progenitor. High prediction accuracy for the classifications of the rotation length scales ($93\%$) and the rotational rates ($95\%$) can be achieved using the gravitational wave signals from -10 ms to 6 ms core bounce. By including additional 48 ms signals during the prompt convection phase, we could achieve $96\%$ accuracy on the classification of four major EoS groups. Combining three models above, we could correctly predict the core rotational rates, rotation length scales, and the EoS at the same time with more than $85\%$ accuracy. Finally, applying a transfer learning method for additional 74 waveforms from FLASH simulations (Pan et al. 2018), we show that our model using Richers' waveforms could successfully predict the rotational rates from Pan's waveforms even for a continuous value with a mean absolute errors of 0.32 rad s$^{-1}$ only. These results demonstrate a much broader parameter regimes our model can be applied for the identification of core-collapse supernova events through GW signals.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Contrastive self-supervised convolutional autoencoder for core-collapse supernova gravitational-wave detection

    gr-qc 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A contrastive self-supervised convolutional autoencoder detects core-collapse supernova gravitational waves with performance comparable to supervised CNNs, better generalization to unseen waveforms, and ~120 kpc sensi...

  2. The Generalization Gap in Machine Learning EoS Inference from Core-Collapse Supernova Gravitational Waves

    astro-ph.HE 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.5

    LightGBM and other regressors achieve R^{2}≈0.6–0.7 under random CV on CCSN GW catalogues but collapse to worse-than-mean performance under Leave-One-EoS-Out validation, exposing a generalisation gap for unseen EoS families.

  3. Parameter Estimation Horizon of Core-Collapse Supernovae with Current and Next-Generation Gravitational-Wave Detectors

    astro-ph.HE 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Machine learning extracts core rotation and signal properties from CCSN gravitational waves, with next-generation detectors constraining rotation beyond 100 kpc for favorable orientations despite some uncertainties.

  4. Toward More Realistic Machine-Learning Inference of the Dense-Matter Equation of State from Supernova Gravitational Waves

    astro-ph.HE 2026-03 conditional novelty 4.5

    Real detector noise, multi-progenitor diversity, and 20 ms bounce-time uncertainty leave EOS classification accuracy from CCSN GWs largely intact; larger datasets improve it.