Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Cognitive Architecture for Co-Evolutionary Hybrid Intelligence

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2209.12623 v1 pith:MBZI7FHR submitted 2022-09-05 cs.AI

classification cs.AI
keywords intelligencecognitivepartco-evolutionaryhybridintelligentarchitecturehumans
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper questions the feasibility of a strong (general) data-centric artificial intelligence (AI). The disadvantages of this type of intelligence are discussed. As an alternative, the concept of co-evolutionary hybrid intelligence is proposed. It is based on the cognitive interoperability of man and machine. An analysis of existing approaches to the construction of cognitive architectures is given. An architecture seamlessly incorporates a human into the loop of intelligent problem solving is considered. The article is organized as follows. The first part contains a critique of data-centric intelligent systems. The reasons why it is impossible to create a strong artificial intelligence based on this type of intelligence are indicated. The second part briefly presents the concept of co-evolutionary hybrid intelligence and shows its advantages. The third part gives an overview and analysis of existing cognitive architectures. It is concluded that many do not consider humans part of the intelligent data processing process. The next part discusses the cognitive architecture for co-evolutionary hybrid intelligence, providing integration with humans. It finishes with general conclusions about the feasibility of developing intelligent systems with humans in the problem-solving loop.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Mapping Human-Agent Co-Learning and Co-Adaptation: A Scoping Review

    cs.AI 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A scoping review of 77 papers on human-agent co-learning and co-adaptation finds that most work claims two-way adaptation, with reinforcement learning and decision-making or trust frameworks dominating.

Pith tools