REVIEW 1 cited by
On the Salient Limitations of the Methods of Assembly Theory and their Classification of Molecular Biosignatures
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We demonstrate that the assembly pathway method underlying assembly theory (AT) is an encoding scheme widely used by popular statistical compression algorithms. We show that in all cases (synthetic or natural) AT performs similarly to other simple coding schemes and underperforms compared to system-related indexes based upon algorithmic probability that take into account statistical repetitions but also the likelihood of other computable patterns. Our results imply that the assembly index does not offer substantial improvements over existing methods, including traditional statistical ones, and imply that the separation between living and non-living compounds following these methods has been reported before.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Assembly in Directed Hypergraphs
Assembly pathways in assembly theory coincide with minimal B-hyperpaths, which allows integer linear programming computation and exposes a cyclization blindness in the assembly index.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.