REVIEW 4 cited by
LPT: Long-tailed Prompt Tuning for Image Classification
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
For long-tailed classification, most works often pretrain a big model on a large-scale dataset, and then fine-tune the whole model for adapting to long-tailed data. Though promising, fine-tuning the whole pretrained model tends to suffer from high cost in computation and deployment of different models for different tasks, as well as weakened generalization ability for overfitting to certain features of long-tailed data. To alleviate these issues, we propose an effective Long-tailed Prompt Tuning method for long-tailed classification. LPT introduces several trainable prompts into a frozen pretrained model to adapt it to long-tailed data. For better effectiveness, we divide prompts into two groups: 1) a shared prompt for the whole long-tailed dataset to learn general features and to adapt a pretrained model into target domain; and 2) group-specific prompts to gather group-specific features for the samples which have similar features and also to empower the pretrained model with discrimination ability. Then we design a two-phase training paradigm to learn these prompts. In phase 1, we train the shared prompt via supervised prompt tuning to adapt a pretrained model to the desired long-tailed domain. In phase 2, we use the learnt shared prompt as query to select a small best matched set for a group of similar samples from the group-specific prompt set to dig the common features of these similar samples, then optimize these prompts with dual sampling strategy and asymmetric GCL loss. By only fine-tuning a few prompts while fixing the pretrained model, LPT can reduce training and deployment cost by storing a few prompts, and enjoys a strong generalization ability of the pretrained model. Experiments show that on various long-tailed benchmarks, with only ~1.1% extra parameters, LPT achieves comparable performance than previous whole model fine-tuning methods, and is more robust to domain-shift.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
SHED: Style-Homogenized Embedding Alignment for Domain Generalization
SHED improves domain generalization in CLIP by aligning style-homogenized embeddings instead of raw ones, achieving state-of-the-art results on five benchmarks including a 4% gain on DomainNet.
-
LoFT: Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning for Long-tailed Semi-Supervised Learning in Open-World Scenarios
LoFT uses parameter-efficient fine-tuning of foundation models for long-tailed semi-supervised learning, supported by proofs that this reduces hypothesis complexity to minimize balanced posterior error and compresses ...
-
Deep Reprogramming Distillation for Medical Foundation Models
DRD introduces a reprogramming module and CKA-based distillation to enable efficient, robust adaptation of medical foundation models to downstream 2D/3D classification and segmentation tasks, outperforming prior PEFT ...
-
SciLT: Long-tailed Image Classification under Scientific Image Domains
On scientific long-tailed image tasks, foundation-model fine-tuning gains are limited; SciLT fuses penultimate and final ViT features under dual supervision to improve balanced accuracy.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.