Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Explainable Verbal Deception Detection using Transformers

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2210.03080 v1 pith:JRU4USWX submitted 2022-10-06 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords deceptionmodelsdeceptivedetectionautomateddeep-learningliwcstatements
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

People are regularly confronted with potentially deceptive statements (e.g., fake news, misleading product reviews, or lies about activities). Only few works on automated text-based deception detection have exploited the potential of deep learning approaches. A critique of deep-learning methods is their lack of interpretability, preventing us from understanding the underlying (linguistic) mechanisms involved in deception. However, recent advancements have made it possible to explain some aspects of such models. This paper proposes and evaluates six deep-learning models, including combinations of BERT (and RoBERTa), MultiHead Attention, co-attentions, and transformers. To understand how the models reach their decisions, we then examine the model's predictions with LIME. We then zoom in on vocabulary uniqueness and the correlation of LIWC categories with the outcome class (truthful vs deceptive). The findings suggest that our transformer-based models can enhance automated deception detection performances (+2.11% in accuracy) and show significant differences pertinent to the usage of LIWC features in truthful and deceptive statements.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Hidden in Plain Sight: Evaluation of the Deception Detection Capabilities of LLMs in Multimodal Settings

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    An evaluation of 7 LLMs/LMMs on 3 deception datasets shows fine-tuned text LLMs set benchmarks on review spam while multimodal models lag behind video-based baselines.

Pith tools