Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Leave-group-out cross-validation for latent Gaussian models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2210.04482 v6 pith:2WYZMSGY submitted 2022-10-10 stat.CO stat.APstat.ME

classification stat.COstat.APstat.ME
keywords cross-validationloocvmodelspredictioneffectsgaussianhierarchicallatent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Evaluating the predictive performance of a statistical model is commonly done using cross-validation. Among the various methods, leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV) is frequently used. Originally designed for exchangeable observations, LOOCV has since been extended to other cases such as hierarchical models. However, it focuses primarily on short-range prediction and may not fully capture long-range prediction scenarios. For structured hierarchical models, particularly those involving multiple random effects, the concepts of short- and long-range predictions become less clear, which can complicate the interpretation of LOOCV results. In this paper, we propose a complementary cross-validation framework specifcally tailored for longer-range prediction in latent Gaussian models, including those with structured random effects. Our approach differs from LOOCV by excluding a carefully constructed set from the training set, which better emulates longer-range prediction conditions. Furthermore, we achieve computational effciency by adjusting the full joint posterior for this modifed cross-validation, thus eliminating the need for model reftting. This method is implemented in the R-INLA package (www.r-inla.org) and can be adapted to a variety of inferential frameworks.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Partial pooling predicts cross-validation reliability: a closed-form triage and Rao-Blackwellised cure for hierarchical LOO

    stat.ME 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    The pooling factor predicts where PSIS-LOO will fail, and Rao–Blackwellised integration over random effects corrects those folds, reproducing exact leave-one-out refits at zero refit cost.

  2. Adaptive sequential Monte Carlo for structured cross validation in Bayesian hierarchical models

    stat.CO 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Adaptive sequential Monte Carlo with automatically constructed intermediate posteriors approximates structured leave-group, leave-subset, and leave-end-out cross-validation without full MCMC reruns.

Pith tools