RECORD
Multiplicity dependence of charged-particle jet production in pp collisions at 13 TeV with ALICE
High Energy Physics - Experiment · Submitted 10 Oct 2022
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim Measurements of jet production and jet properties in pp collisions provide a test of perturbative quantum chromodynamics (pQCD) and form a baseline for similar measurements in heavy ion (A--A) collisions.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
Measurements of jet production and jet properties in pp collisions provide a test of perturbative quantum chromodynamics (pQCD) and form a baseline for similar measurements in heavy ion (A--A) collisions. In this contribution, we report recent ALICE measurements of charged-particle jet production and intra-jet properties, including mean charged-constituent multiplicity and fragmentation distribution for leading jets, in minimum bias pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 13\,$TeV. In addition, the event multiplicity dependence of jet production and jet properties in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 13\,$TeV will be presented. Results will be compared with theoretical model predictions.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | Measurements of jet production and jet properties in pp collisions provide a test of perturbative quantum chromodynamics (pQCD) and form a baseline for similar measurements in heavy ion (A--A) collisions. | background 1.00 | 0.06 | 0.03 | asserted 1.00 |
| s1 | In this contribution, we report recent ALICE measurements of charged-particle jet production and intra-jet properties, including mean charged-constituent multiplicity and fragmentation distribution for leading jets, in minimum bias pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 13\,$TeV. | contribution 1.00 | 0.96 | 0.06 | asserted 0.97 |
| s2 | In addition, the event multiplicity dependence of jet production and jet properties in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 13\,$TeV will be presented. | contribution 0.97 | 0.63 | 0.04 | asserted 0.81 |
| s3 | Results will be compared with theoretical model predictions. | method 0.64 | 0.38 | 0.04 | asserted 0.81 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v2
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
Measurements of jet production and jet properties in pp collisions provide a test of perturbative quantum chromodynamics (pQCD) and form a baseline for similar measurements in heavy ion (A--A) collisions. In this contribution, we report recent ALICE measurements of charged-particle jet production and intra-jet properties, including mean charged-constituent multiplicity and fragmentation distribution for leading jets, in minimum bias pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 13\,$TeV. In addition, the event multiplicity dependence of jet production and jet properties in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 13\,$TeV will be presented. Results will be compared with theoretical model predictions.
Human review
How the literature uses it
What this paper does with the arXiv papers it cites
What it cites
Uses the method or tool of 1 paper
-
A 2-D Bayesian unfolding technique [ref] implemented in RooUnfold [ref] package is applied to correct for the instrumental effects.
Unfolding algorithms and tests using RooUnfold · Analysis details · 1.00
Compares with 1 paper
-
The $<N_ch>$ is larger for HM events and is qualitatively reproduced by PYTHIA8 Monash2013 [ref] for $p_T^jet,ch <$ 20 GeV/$c$.
Tuning PYTHIA 8.1: the Monash 2013 Tune · Results and discussion · 0.96
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.