Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Assessments and developments in constructing a National Health Index for policy making, in the United Kingdom

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2210.05154 v1 pith:PI6QJ6U4 submitted 2022-10-11 stat.AP

Assessments and developments in constructing a National Health Index for policy making, in the United Kingdom

classification stat.AP
keywords healthindexanalysisdifferentdomainsnationalweightsassess
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Composite indicators are a useful tool to summarize, measure and compare changes among different communities. The UK Office for National Statistics has created an annual England Health Index (starting from 2015) comprised of three main health domains - lives, places and people - to monitor health measures, over time and across different geographical areas (149 Upper Tier Level Authorities, 9 regions and an overall national index) and to evaluate the health of the nation. The composite indicator is defined as a weighted average (linear combination) of indicators within subdomains, subdomains within domains, and domains within the overall index. The Health Index was designed to be comparable over time, geographically harmonized and to serve as a tool for policy implementation and assessment. We evaluated the steps taken in the construction, reviewing the conceptual coherence and statistical requirements on Health Index data for 2015-2018. To assess these, we have focused on three main steps: correlation analysis at different index levels; comparison of the implemented weights derived from factor analysis with two alternative weights from principal components analysis and optimized system weights; a sensitivity and uncertainty analysis to assess to what extent rankings depend on the selected set of methodological choices. Based on the results, we have highlighted features that have improved statistical requirements of the forthcoming UK Health Index.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.