Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Neural Networks are Decision Trees

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2210.05189 v3 pith:LNPBJ3OD submitted 2022-10-11 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords networksneuraldecisionnetworkrepresentationsometreetrees
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In this manuscript, we show that any neural network with any activation function can be represented as a decision tree. The representation is equivalence and not an approximation, thus keeping the accuracy of the neural network exactly as is. We believe that this work provides better understanding of neural networks and paves the way to tackle their black-box nature. We share equivalent trees of some neural networks and show that besides providing interpretability, tree representation can also achieve some computational advantages for small networks. The analysis holds both for fully connected and convolutional networks, which may or may not also include skip connections and/or normalizations.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 17 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. Even Faster Hyperbolic Random Forests: A Beltrami-Klein Wrapper Approach

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Fast-HyperDT reexpresses HyperDT as pre- and post-processing around standard Euclidean trees, making hyperbolic random forests practical.

Pith tools