REVIEW 1 cited by
Neural Networks are Decision Trees
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
In this manuscript, we show that any neural network with any activation function can be represented as a decision tree. The representation is equivalence and not an approximation, thus keeping the accuracy of the neural network exactly as is. We believe that this work provides better understanding of neural networks and paves the way to tackle their black-box nature. We share equivalent trees of some neural networks and show that besides providing interpretability, tree representation can also achieve some computational advantages for small networks. The analysis holds both for fully connected and convolutional networks, which may or may not also include skip connections and/or normalizations.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Even Faster Hyperbolic Random Forests: A Beltrami-Klein Wrapper Approach
Fast-HyperDT reexpresses HyperDT as pre- and post-processing around standard Euclidean trees, making hyperbolic random forests practical.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.