REVIEW 2 cited by
The Extreme Cardiac MRI Analysis Challenge under Respiratory Motion (CMRxMotion)
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
The quality of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging is susceptible to respiratory motion artifacts. The model robustness of automated segmentation techniques in face of real-world respiratory motion artifacts is unclear. This manuscript describes the design of extreme cardiac MRI analysis challenge under respiratory motion (CMRxMotion Challenge). The challenge aims to establish a public benchmark dataset to assess the effects of respiratory motion on image quality and examine the robustness of segmentation models. The challenge recruited 40 healthy volunteers to perform different breath-hold behaviors during one imaging visit, obtaining paired cine imaging with artifacts. Radiologists assessed the image quality and annotated the level of respiratory motion artifacts. For those images with diagnostic quality, radiologists further segmented the left ventricle, left ventricle myocardium and right ventricle. The images of training set (20 volunteers) along with the annotations are released to the challenge participants, to develop an automated image quality assessment model (Task 1) and an automated segmentation model (Task 2). The images of validation set (5 volunteers) are released to the challenge participants but the annotations are withheld for online evaluation of submitted predictions. Both the images and annotations of the test set (15 volunteers) were withheld and only used for offline evaluation of submitted containerized dockers. The image quality assessment task is quantitatively evaluated by the Cohen's kappa statistics and the segmentation task is evaluated by the Dice scores and Hausdorff distances.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
MedSG-Bench: A Benchmark for Medical Image Sequences Grounding
MedSG-Bench evaluates visual grounding across medical image sequences, shows that existing MLLMs score very low, and provides a large instruction-tuning set and a fine-tuned model, MedSeq-Grounder.
-
Interactive Medical Image Segmentation: A Benchmark Dataset and Baseline
IMed-361M, built by combining 110 public and private datasets and adding 273 million machine-generated masks, is released with an interactive segmentation baseline that outperforms existing models on several external ...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.