Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

The Extreme Cardiac MRI Analysis Challenge under Respiratory Motion (CMRxMotion)

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2210.06385 v1 pith:WTQUPAVQ submitted 2022-10-12 eess.IV cs.CVphysics.med-ph

classification eess.IVcs.CVphysics.med-ph
keywords challengemotionqualityrespiratoryartifactsimageimagessegmentation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

The quality of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging is susceptible to respiratory motion artifacts. The model robustness of automated segmentation techniques in face of real-world respiratory motion artifacts is unclear. This manuscript describes the design of extreme cardiac MRI analysis challenge under respiratory motion (CMRxMotion Challenge). The challenge aims to establish a public benchmark dataset to assess the effects of respiratory motion on image quality and examine the robustness of segmentation models. The challenge recruited 40 healthy volunteers to perform different breath-hold behaviors during one imaging visit, obtaining paired cine imaging with artifacts. Radiologists assessed the image quality and annotated the level of respiratory motion artifacts. For those images with diagnostic quality, radiologists further segmented the left ventricle, left ventricle myocardium and right ventricle. The images of training set (20 volunteers) along with the annotations are released to the challenge participants, to develop an automated image quality assessment model (Task 1) and an automated segmentation model (Task 2). The images of validation set (5 volunteers) are released to the challenge participants but the annotations are withheld for online evaluation of submitted predictions. Both the images and annotations of the test set (15 volunteers) were withheld and only used for offline evaluation of submitted containerized dockers. The image quality assessment task is quantitatively evaluated by the Cohen's kappa statistics and the segmentation task is evaluated by the Dice scores and Hausdorff distances.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. MedSG-Bench: A Benchmark for Medical Image Sequences Grounding

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    MedSG-Bench evaluates visual grounding across medical image sequences, shows that existing MLLMs score very low, and provides a large instruction-tuning set and a fine-tuned model, MedSeq-Grounder.

  2. Interactive Medical Image Segmentation: A Benchmark Dataset and Baseline

    cs.CV 2024-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    IMed-361M, built by combining 110 public and private datasets and adding 273 million machine-generated masks, is released with an interactive segmentation baseline that outperforms existing models on several external ...

Pith tools