REVIEW 2 cited by
CROWDLAB: Supervised learning to infer consensus labels and quality scores for data with multiple annotators
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Real-world data for classification is often labeled by multiple annotators. For analyzing such data, we introduce CROWDLAB, a straightforward approach to utilize any trained classifier to estimate: (1) A consensus label for each example that aggregates the available annotations; (2) A confidence score for how likely each consensus label is correct; (3) A rating for each annotator quantifying the overall correctness of their labels. Existing algorithms to estimate related quantities in crowdsourcing often rely on sophisticated generative models with iterative inference. CROWDLAB instead uses a straightforward weighted ensemble. Existing algorithms often rely solely on annotator statistics, ignoring the features of the examples from which the annotations derive. CROWDLAB utilizes any classifier model trained on these features, and can thus better generalize between examples with similar features. On real-world multi-annotator image data, our proposed method provides superior estimates for (1)-(3) than existing algorithms like Dawid-Skene/GLAD.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
A Model for Imbalanced Label Aggregation: A Focus on Minority-Class Detection
CC-Rasch recovers rare labels better than standard aggregators by letting both annotator competence and item difficulty vary by class, with supporting theory for majority vote under imbalance.
-
BACON: Budgeted Human Calibration for Modeling and Evaluation with Multiple AI Judges
BACON calibrates multiple AI judges against a small human-labeled sample, then uses cross-fitted outcome models and augmented estimating equations to produce calibrated summary estimates and item-level surrogate scores.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.