Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Probing the interaction between dark energy and dark matter with future fast radio burst observations

Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics · Submitted 13 Oct 2022

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim In all the IDE models, about $10^6$ FRB data can achieve the absolute errors of $\beta$ to less than $0.10$, providing a way to precisely measure $\beta$ by only one cosmological probe.

how it is stated · asserted 0.86 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2210.07162 (version 2)
Pith IDYQAUFR5Y, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationJi-Guo Zhang, Jing-Fei Zhang, Ling-Feng Wang, Xin Zhang, Ze-Wei Zhao. "Probing the interaction between dark energy and dark matter with future fast radio burst observations." arXiv:2210.07162 (2022). https://pith.science/paper/YQAUFR5Y
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 5,125 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.79 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.19 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.98 · compares with prior results 0.92 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Interacting dark energy (IDE) scenario assumes that there exists a direct interaction between dark energy and cold dark matter, but this interaction is hard to be tightly constrained by the current data. Fast radio bursts (FRBs) will be seen in large numbers by future radio telescopes, and thus they have potential to become a promising low-redshift cosmological probe. In this work, we investigate the capability of future FRBs of constraining the dimensionless coupling parameter $\beta$ in four phenomenological IDE models. If we fix the FRB properties, about $10^5$ FRB data can give constraints on $\beta$ tighter than the current cosmic microwave background data in the IDE models with the interaction proportional to the energy density of dark energy. In all the IDE models, about $10^6$ FRB data can achieve the absolute errors of $\beta$ to less than $0.10$, providing a way to precisely measure $\beta$ by only one cosmological probe. Jointly constraining the FRB properties and cosmological parameters would increase the constraint errors of $\beta$ by a factor of about 0.5-2.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Interacting dark energy (IDE) scenario assumes that there exists a direct interaction between dark energy and cold dark matter, but this interaction is hard to be tightly constrained by the current data. background 0.63 0.04 0.02 asserted 0.98
s1 Fast radio bursts (FRBs) will be seen in large numbers by future radio telescopes, and thus they have potential to become a promising low-redshift cosmological probe. background 0.99 0.06 0.03 hedged possibility 0.84
s2 In this work, we investigate the capability of future FRBs of constraining the dimensionless coupling parameter $\beta$ in four phenomenological IDE models. contribution 1.00 0.84 0.08 asserted 0.88
s3 If we fix the FRB properties, about $10^5$ FRB data can give constraints on $\beta$ tighter than the current cosmic microwave background data in the IDE models with the interaction proportional to the energy density of dark energy. result 1.00 0.76 0.22 hedged possibility 0.62
s4 In all the IDE models, about $10^6$ FRB data can achieve the absolute errors of $\beta$ to less than $0.10$, providing a way to precisely measure $\beta$ by only one cosmological probe. result 0.99 0.82 0.57 asserted 0.86
s5 Jointly constraining the FRB properties and cosmological parameters would increase the constraint errors of $\beta$ by a factor of about 0.5-2. result 0.95 0.79 0.08 asserted 0.92

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: simulation study 0.50 · evidence from simulation or computation 0.93.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Interacting dark energy (IDE) scenario assumes that there exists a direct interaction between dark energy and cold dark matter, but this interaction is hard to be tightly constrained by the current data. Fast radio bursts (FRBs) will be seen in large numbers by future radio telescopes, and thus they have potential to become a promising low-redshift cosmological probe. In this work, we investigate the capability of future FRBs of constraining the dimensionless coupling parameter $\beta$ in four phenomenological IDE models. If we fix the FRB properties, about $10^5$ FRB data can give constraints on $\beta$ tighter than the current cosmic microwave background data in the IDE models with the interaction proportional to the energy density of dark energy. In all the IDE models, about $10^6$ FRB data can achieve the absolute errors of $\beta$ to less than $0.10$, providing a way to precisely measure $\beta$ by only one cosmological probe. Jointly constraining the FRB properties and cosmological parameters would increase the constraint errors of $\beta$ by a factor of about 0.5-2.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

10 arXiv papers cite this in 10 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 5 sentences without a confident label

Cites it as support 1 paper
Cites it as background 4 papers

What it cites · 83 sentences without a confident label

Uses the method or tool of 2 papers
Uses data or values from 9 papers
Cites as background 24 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.