REVIEW 5 cited by
Towards a Unified Multi-Dimensional Evaluator for Text Generation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Multi-dimensional evaluation is the dominant paradigm for human evaluation in Natural Language Generation (NLG), i.e., evaluating the generated text from multiple explainable dimensions, such as coherence and fluency. However, automatic evaluation in NLG is still dominated by similarity-based metrics, and we lack a reliable framework for a more comprehensive evaluation of advanced models. In this paper, we propose a unified multi-dimensional evaluator UniEval for NLG. We re-frame NLG evaluation as a Boolean Question Answering (QA) task, and by guiding the model with different questions, we can use one evaluator to evaluate from multiple dimensions. Furthermore, thanks to the unified Boolean QA format, we are able to introduce an intermediate learning phase that enables UniEval to incorporate external knowledge from multiple related tasks and gain further improvement. Experiments on three typical NLG tasks show that UniEval correlates substantially better with human judgments than existing metrics. Specifically, compared to the top-performing unified evaluators, UniEval achieves a 23% higher correlation on text summarization, and over 43% on dialogue response generation. Also, UniEval demonstrates a strong zero-shot learning ability for unseen evaluation dimensions and tasks. Source code, data and all pre-trained evaluators are available on our GitHub repository (https://github.com/maszhongming/UniEval).
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
A Red Teaming Framework for Large Language Models: A Case Study on Faithfulness Evaluation
Introduces a multi-role red teaming framework using attacker and jury models that increases attack success rates by up to 7.9% on LLM faithfulness in question-answering tasks.
-
Towards Personalized Explanations for Health Simulations: A Mixed-Methods Framework for Stakeholder-Centric Summarization
A mixed-methods framework that elicits stakeholder preferences and steers LLMs to generate tailored summaries of health simulations, presented without empirical validation.
-
AllSummedUp: un framework open-source pour comparer les metriques d'evaluation de resume
On SummEval, LLM-based summary evaluators are expensive and unstable, and several published correlations did not reproduce when using open-weight models.
-
AIGVE-MACS: Unified Multi-Aspect Commenting and Scoring Model for AI-Generated Video Evaluation
A finetuned vision-language model jointly predicts nine aspect scores and written comments for AI-generated videos, with a new benchmark and claims of state-of-the-art alignment with human judgment.
-
CAI: Caption-Sensitive Attention Intervention for Mitigating Object Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models
CAI reduces object hallucination in LVLMs by injecting caption-query attention patterns into selected attention heads at inference time.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.