Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Discrete & Bayesian Transaction Fee Mechanisms

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2210.07793 v5 pith:67YDHJJT submitted 2022-10-14 cs.GT econ.TH

classification cs.GTecon.TH
keywords revenuemechanismsfeesincentive-compatiblepropertiestfmsbayesiandiscretizing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Cryptocurrencies employ auction-esque transaction fee mechanisms (TFMs) to allocate transactions to blocks, and to determine how much fees miners can collect from transactions. Several impossibility results show that TFMs that satisfy a standard set of "good" properties obtain low revenue, and in certain cases, no revenue at all. In this work, we circumvent previous impossibilities by showing that when desired TFM properties are reasonably relaxed, simple mechanisms can obtain strictly positive revenue. By discretizing fees, we design a TFM that satisfies the extended TFM desiderata: it is dominant strategy incentive-compatible (DSIC), myopic miner incentive-compatible (MMIC), side-contract-proof (SCP) and obtains asymptotically optimal revenue (i.e., linear in the number of allocated bids), and optimal revenue when considering separable TFMs. If instead of discretizing fees we relax the DSIC and SCP properties, we show that Bitcoin's TFM, after applying the revelation principle, is Bayesian incentive-compatible (BIC), MMIC, off-chain-agreement (OCA) proof, and approximately revenue-optimal. We reach our results by characterizing the class of multi-item OCA-proof mechanisms, which may be of independent interest.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Transaction Fee Mechanism Design for Leaderless Blockchain Protocols

    cs.GT 2025-05 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    The paper introduces a game-theoretic model and the FPA-EQ fee mechanism for multi-proposer blockchains, with a tight 63.2% welfare guarantee and matching impossibility results.

  2. Order Auctions with Private Position Preferences

    cs.GT 2026-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Adding one demand bit to a two-slot first-price auction raises the guaranteed equilibrium welfare from 1/2 to 1-1/e of the efficient benchmark.

Pith tools