REVIEW 3 cited by
A Survey of Active Learning for Natural Language Processing
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
In this work, we provide a survey of active learning (AL) for its applications in natural language processing (NLP). In addition to a fine-grained categorization of query strategies, we also investigate several other important aspects of applying AL to NLP problems. These include AL for structured prediction tasks, annotation cost, model learning (especially with deep neural models), and starting and stopping AL. Finally, we conclude with a discussion of related topics and future directions.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
CodeGENCAT: Generative Computerized Adaptive Testing for Open-ended Coding Problems
A generative model of student code responses improves early-stage adaptive-test question selection, yielding up to 4.32% higher AUC than a 1PL baseline.
-
ART: Adaptive Relation Tuning for Generalized Relation Prediction
ART adapts VLMs for visual relation classification via instruction tuning with adaptive, uncertainty-based instance selection, improving generalization to unseen and rare relations.
-
Actively evaluating and learning the distinctions that matter: Vaccine safety signal detection from emergency triage notes
An active-learning pipeline with counterfactual data augmentation achieved F1 0.97 for detecting potential vaccine adverse events in emergency triage notes, but the evaluation was not independent of model training.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.