Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Multi-Objective Recommender Systems: Survey and Challenges

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2210.10309 v1 pith:ROG4GYQY submitted 2022-10-19 cs.IR cs.LG

classification cs.IRcs.LG
keywords objectivescompetingrecommendersystemslevelmulti-objectivechallengescontent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recommender systems can be characterized as software solutions that provide users convenient access to relevant content. Traditionally, recommender systems research predominantly focuses on developing machine learning algorithms that aim to predict which content is relevant for individual users. In real-world applications, however, optimizing the accuracy of such relevance predictions as a single objective in many cases is not sufficient. Instead, multiple and often competing objectives have to be considered, leading to a need for more research in multi-objective recommender systems. We can differentiate between several types of such competing goals, including (i) competing recommendation quality objectives at the individual and aggregate level, (ii) competing objectives of different involved stakeholders, (iii) long-term vs. short-term objectives, (iv) objectives at the user interface level, and (v) system level objectives. In this paper we review these types of multi-objective recommendation settings and outline open challenges in this area.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Datasets for Navigating Sensitive Topics in Recommendation Systems

    cs.IR 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Two benchmark datasets link user-preference data (MovieLens, Archive of Our Own) with community content-warning labels to study sensitive-content exposure in recommender systems.

Pith tools