REVIEW 1 cited by
Rethinking Sharpness-Aware Minimization as Variational Inference
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Sharpness-aware minimization (SAM) aims to improve the generalisation of gradient-based learning by seeking out flat minima. In this work, we establish connections between SAM and Mean-Field Variational Inference (MFVI) of neural network parameters. We show that both these methods have interpretations as optimizing notions of flatness, and when using the reparametrisation trick, they both boil down to calculating the gradient at a perturbed version of the current mean parameter. This thinking motivates our study of algorithms that combine or interpolate between SAM and MFVI. We evaluate the proposed variational algorithms on several benchmark datasets, and compare their performance to variants of SAM. Taking a broader perspective, our work suggests that SAM-like updates can be used as a drop-in replacement for the reparametrisation trick.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Monge SAM: Robust Reparameterization-Invariant Sharpness-Aware Minimization Based on Loss Geometry
M-SAM replaces SAM's Euclidean perturbation with a Monge-metric perturbation, a scaled version of SAM's step, and claims improved robustness and reduced attraction to saddle points.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.