Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A Survey of Dataset Refinement for Problems in Computer Vision Datasets

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2210.11717 v2 pith:E6VAGMEA submitted 2022-10-21 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords datasetrefinementproblemsdatasetscomputervisiondatadata-centric
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Large-scale datasets have played a crucial role in the advancement of computer vision. However, they often suffer from problems such as class imbalance, noisy labels, dataset bias, or high resource costs, which can inhibit model performance and reduce trustworthiness. With the advocacy of data-centric research, various data-centric solutions have been proposed to solve the dataset problems mentioned above. They improve the quality of datasets by re-organizing them, which we call dataset refinement. In this survey, we provide a comprehensive and structured overview of recent advances in dataset refinement for problematic computer vision datasets. Firstly, we summarize and analyze the various problems encountered in large-scale computer vision datasets. Then, we classify the dataset refinement algorithms into three categories based on the refinement process: data sampling, data subset selection, and active learning. In addition, we organize these dataset refinement methods according to the addressed data problems and provide a systematic comparative description. We point out that these three types of dataset refinement have distinct advantages and disadvantages for dataset problems, which informs the choice of the data-centric method appropriate to a particular research objective. Finally, we summarize the current literature and propose potential future research topics.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Locating and Mitigating Gradient Conflicts in Point Cloud Domain Adaptation via Saliency Map Skewness

    cs.CV 2025-04 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Filtering out point-cloud samples with high saliency-map skewness from self-supervision losses raises point-cloud unsupervised domain adaptation accuracy by about 1 to 2 points on PointDA-10 and PointSegDA.

Pith tools