Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Google's Quantum Supremacy Claim: Data, Documentation, and Discussion

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2210.12753 v3 pith:62DRTQFB submitted 2022-10-23 quant-ph cs.CC

classification quant-phcs.CC
keywords experimentgoogledataquantumbeeninformationsomestatistical
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

In October 2019, Nature published a paper describing an experiment that took place at Google. The paper claims to demonstrate quantum (computational) supremacy on a 53-qubit quantum computer. Since September 2019 we have been involved in a long-term project to study various statistical aspects of the Google experiment. We have been trying to gather the relevant data and information in order to reconstruct and verify those parts of the Google experiment that are based on classical computations (except when the required computation is too heavy), and to perform a statistical analysis on the data. This document describes the available data and information for the Google experiment, some main questions in the evaluation of the experiment, and some of our results and plans.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Empowering Large Scale Quantum Circuit Development: Effective Simulation of Sycamore Circuits

    quant-ph 2024-11 reject novelty 2.0 of 10

    A commercial SDK claims to simulate 53-qubit Sycamore circuits on 32GB RAM with an average XEB of 0.678, but the benchmark is weakly supported and partly self-referential.

Pith tools