REVIEW 1 cited by
Google's Quantum Supremacy Claim: Data, Documentation, and Discussion
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
In October 2019, Nature published a paper describing an experiment that took place at Google. The paper claims to demonstrate quantum (computational) supremacy on a 53-qubit quantum computer. Since September 2019 we have been involved in a long-term project to study various statistical aspects of the Google experiment. We have been trying to gather the relevant data and information in order to reconstruct and verify those parts of the Google experiment that are based on classical computations (except when the required computation is too heavy), and to perform a statistical analysis on the data. This document describes the available data and information for the Google experiment, some main questions in the evaluation of the experiment, and some of our results and plans.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Empowering Large Scale Quantum Circuit Development: Effective Simulation of Sycamore Circuits
A commercial SDK claims to simulate 53-qubit Sycamore circuits on 32GB RAM with an average XEB of 0.678, but the benchmark is weakly supported and partly self-referential.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.