Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Are Current Task-oriented Dialogue Systems Able to Satisfy Impolite Users?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2210.12942 v1 pith:O7A32GXM submitted 2022-10-24 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords impolitesystemsdialogueuserscorpusresearchchallengingdialogues
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Task-oriented dialogue (TOD) systems have assisted users on many tasks, including ticket booking and service inquiries. While existing TOD systems have shown promising performance in serving customer needs, these systems mostly assume that users would interact with the dialogue agent politely. This assumption is unrealistic as impatient or frustrated customers may also interact with TOD systems impolitely. This paper aims to address this research gap by investigating impolite users' effects on TOD systems. Specifically, we constructed an impolite dialogue corpus and conducted extensive experiments to evaluate the state-of-the-art TOD systems on our impolite dialogue corpus. Our experimental results show that existing TOD systems are unable to handle impolite user utterances. We also present a data augmentation method to improve TOD performance in impolite dialogues. Nevertheless, handling impolite dialogues remains a very challenging research task. We hope by releasing the impolite dialogue corpus and establishing the benchmark evaluations, more researchers are encouraged to investigate this new challenging research task.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Learning Text Styles: A Study on Transfer, Attribution, and Verification

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A thesis compiles published work claiming that lightweight adapters, contrastive disentanglement, and instruction tuning improve text style transfer, authorship attribution, and authorship verification.

Pith tools